-=| Trent W. Buck, Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:18:33PM +1000 |=- > Damyan Ivanov <[email protected]> writes: > > I agree with this. Still, I thing the implementation belongs > > outside > > of eeepc-acpi-scripts. > > Then why is eeepc-acpi-scripts calling pm-suspend?
Good question. Because, sadly, the goal to integrate all the bits in the 'mainline' was always treated as 'second class'. The first priority seems to be making things work. Which is fine, of course, people want to improve their experience, but diverges with the project goals. At least this is how I see things. And, again, I have no veto powers and am fine if others disagree.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Debian-eeepc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-eeepc-devel
