>>>>"RM" == Roland Mas schrieb am Sun, 26 Aug 2001 14:10:36 +0200:
RM> There are obviously more to come. I might "reject" some RM> suggestions though (some for which the license is not clear), or RM> split them into other packages. I might suggest scanning through the Emacs Lisp List and newly opened Emacs Lisp Archive. Perhaps it might be worthwhile to have some emacs-ell and emacs-lcd packages. Personally, I doubt that your approach is the right way. I don't think that your goodies are goodies in everybody else's view. From the list of elisp files I know nearly all of them at least by name, but don't use any (not even boxquote, which serves a very useful purpose, but for which I use another solution). It's likely that there is also another problem: not every item in g.e.s even runs on all Debian included incarnations of Emacs or XEmacs, so be careful. Just my 2c (Euro), Holger -- --- http://www.coling.uni-freiburg.de/~schauer/ --- "Vi was created by hacking full screen support into ed while under influence of drugs." -- Per Abrahamsen in comp.emacs.xemacs
