Aaron M. Ucko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Makes senses. I'll see if gnus does something sensible that we can use. > > Yep, it includes an emacs-mime module that you can probably take > advantage of.
MH-E already handles attachments using gnus code, so I'll just find out how it does what it does when no attachments are present. > > It's on my MH-E ToDo list now. :-) > > Cool. (Incidentally, I'm actually a former user -- MIT was into MH > when I got there, and I was already an Emacs weenie, so I quickly > gravitated to [a much older version of] MH-E. As you can see from my > headers, I use Gnus these days, but I appreciate MH's model and still > keep messages in individual numbered files.) Thanks. I don't expect that MH-E will get users _from_ gnus, but we might get users that find gnus a bit too complicated. MH-E aims to be easy to setup and use. But back in the day I started using email, stuff like Evolution didn't exist! So there's a crowd we'll never get. Personally, I don't think programs like Outlook or Evolution scale to 500 messages a day. Peter
