On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 11:07:28 +0200, Kai Großjohann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Xavier Maillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Damned ! I was not sure it was the right due to this weird
>>> versionning. Why is this tagged 5.10.6 ?
>>
>> Because it's a newer version than 5.10.6, and it's not really 5.12.
>> You can read more about how dpkg compares versions here:
> The version number used suggests that it is a pre-5.10.7 thing. But
> I think it would be better to use a number that suggests it's a
> pre-5.12 thing.
> Certainly No Gnus is more than 5.11.
Unless larsi decides to release a 5.10.7 (or even
5.10.6.1). My policy is to never assume that upstream shall not
release yet another point release; and thus suddenly require epochs.
manoj
--
Volley Theory: It is better to have lobbed and lost than never to have
lobbed at all.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
