Peter Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We do care about free software, we even treat documentation like > software. Something that the FSF doesn't even do.
Uh, what kind of logic is that? "We care about children, we even treat dogs like children." > We have to not betray the ideals of the Free Software Movement to > prove that their documentation license is non-free? That makes no > sense. Uh, the Free Software Foundation is perfectly aware that the FDL is not a free _software_ license. It was never intended for software, but rather for documentation. It was never intended to be equivalent to the GPL, in which case it would have been rather pointless to write it. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
