On Mon 26 May, Dan Kegel wrote: > I'm interested in the same stuff. I have > a diskless embedded linux compute farm based on various > strange processors. I use busybox currently, but haven't > tried its dpkg yet. I'm currently working on a unified > cross-toolchain building script;
> after that, I might look at how to cross-build debian packages. I'd like to see that. I've been doing a lot of messing about with toolchains at the moment trying to get a nice gcc-arm-linux package for debian, and talking to people about debian policy for cross-compilers so there is consistency across achitectures. I looked at several people's scripts to see which options and runes were generally agreed upon for various purposes. I'd be interested in your opinoins, especially for non-ARM stuff about which I know little. Take a look at this, which is an initial draft suggestd by Jeremie Koenig: http://sprite.fr.eu.org/cross-packages-mini-policy.txt In factthe toolchain-source concept to build a pile of cross-compilers from one source set has not proved workable in practice. We are looking at other schemes right now. (I've built a gcc from 3.2.2cvs20020221 which works for C, C++ but not kernels and a 3.2.3 which works OK for me on kernels but not others (still investigating that) These both come from toolchain source and are available here: http://www.aleph1.co.uk/armlinux/dists/unstable/ and I'm trying to build gcc 3.3 cross-compiler at the moment but I ran out of disk space - grumble - I just trying to clear out some cruft now before trying again. Wookey -- Aleph One Ltd, Bottisham, CAMBRIDGE, CB5 9BA, UK Tel +44 (0) 1223 811679 work: http://www.aleph1.co.uk/ play: http://www.chaos.org.uk/~wookey/
