On Wed Oct 29, 2003 at 10:17:11AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 08:55:24AM +0000, Wookey wrote: > > Erik suggested using uClibc by default for emdebian. I thought that sounded > > very sensible. Here's the conversation so far. > > > > Note that uClibc is going mainstream in incoming 2.6 AFAIK. > That's definitively the way to go.
<uClibc maintainer hat on> While I would certainly like uClibc to be mainstream, it really has no special ties the 2.6 kernel. Perhaps you are thinking of klibc? While I do agree with your enthusiasm, I would not want uClibc to be selected under any false pretext. -Erik -- Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/ --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
