W dniu 20.08.2012 09:59, Thibaut Girka pisze: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 08:41:19AM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: >> W dniu 19.08.2012 21:42, Thibaut Girka pisze:
>>> Another solution would be to have another source package, >>> responsible for building cross-compilers from gcc's source >>> package. As far as I know, that's how it is done for ubuntu, but >>> apt-get sourcing gcc-4.7 from a source package feels wrong to >>> me... >> >> I went that way with gcc-4.[4-7]-armel-cross in Ubuntu. Easy, >> simple, some packages mangling required. Same way with >> binutils-armel-cross. So please take a look at them. > > I took a look at them! Although I have to admit I only remember > looking at the “armel-cross-toolchain-base” branch, which boostraps > the whole thing. This package you should ignore as it will disappear once we get cross-build-dependencies working. > Now, I'm looking at the “gcc-4.x-cross” branch, and it is really > close to what I had in mind. I would like to avoid the duplication in > the control file and override files, though... I'll think about that, > but it's post-GSoC, now ;) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
