+++ Jonathan Nieder [2013-01-24 13:58 -0800]: > Wookey wrote: > > > Now binutils-dev is not currenly multiarch, but is just libs and > > headers so can easily be made so. However it depends on binutils, > > which cannot be an MA:same package as it's full of arch-specific > > binaries. (assembler, linker. etc). However it also contins two > > libraries > > /usr/lib/libbfd-2.23.1-system.so > > /usr/lib/libopcodes-2.23.1-system.so > > Exactly. So one fix would be to split out a libbinutils package, with > a symbols file making clear that Debian packages are not supposed to > link to it.
What does the symbols file contains that makes this clear? Just comments, or are there some suitable runes? Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
