On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 12:34:08PM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 02:38:08PM +1100, Jean-Francois Dive wrote: > > Why only in static route situation ? Would dynamic routes learned by a > > routing protocol make > > any differences ? is rp_filter look at the route cache or does a lookup > > each time? > > Yes that works in dyamic situations, too. But there is nu gurantee, that > incoming packets from a secondary interface are illegal. So it is better to > run this protection only on a router where only one interface leads to the > destination. >
Following the used technique, it should works even on a dual connection, as soon as you have a route pointing properly to the interface .. At least i suppose.. > Greetings > Bernd > -- > (OO) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- > ( .. ) [EMAIL PROTECTED],linux.de,debian.org} http://home.pages.de/~eckes/ > o--o *plush* 2048/93600EFD [EMAIL PROTECTED] +497257930613 BE5-RIPE > (O____O) When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl! > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- -> Jean-Francois Dive --> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
