Your message dated Wed, 25 Apr 2001 22:25:39 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcc-2.95.4-0.010425
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2001 18:04:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 22 13:04:39 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from xtifr by master.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14rODu-0007vP-00; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 13:04:38 -0500
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 13:04:38 -0500
From: Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: misspelled option name -fstd should be -std
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcc-2.95-doc
Version: 1:2.95.4-0.010407
Severity: minor
A typo I guess?
In the node reached by 'info gcc "Invoking GCC" "C Dialect Options"', the
-fstd option is listed. The compiler seems to think that this is spelled
-std -- at least, -fstd=c9x produces an error, while -std=c9x seems to
work as expected.
This may also be present in gcc-3.0-doc; I haven't checked. It probably
just wants to be forwarded upstream.
cheers
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 94894-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2001 20:31:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 25 15:31:20 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14sVwV-0005OP-00; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 15:31:19 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA24598;
Wed, 25 Apr 2001 22:25:40 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id WAA06338;
Wed, 25 Apr 2001 22:25:40 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 22:25:39 +0200 (MEST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed in gcc-2.95.4-0.010425
X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs Lucid
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gcc-2.95 (2.95.4.ds1-0.010424) unstable; urgency=high
* Apply updated ppc-fsirl patch (function.c removed) for all archs again.
urgency=high for powerpc.
* Remove patches included in ppc-fsirl patch: ppc-descriptions, ppc-ice.
* Correct build dependency (hurd-i386) (#94038).
* debian/rules2: Get free memory correctly on hurd (#94127).
* close #68452: ash is available on sparc and doesn't have any
special build rules for sparc.
* close #79882: bind-8.2.3 compiles fine on i386.
* Alpha related bug fixed in 2.95.3 (closes #94137).
* Fix typo in docs (-fstdc -> -stdc). Closes #94894, #94899.
* Not a bug: #93481 (see report).
