Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ah, so it didn't just install it, you had it installed already,
Uh, I had gcc and friends 2.9x installed, yes. > and it got upgraded. FYI, gcc-3.0 is not used by default. I noticed it also installed (upgraded, really) gcc-2.95 later on, so obviously it isn't replacing it with 3.0. Good, I was a bit worried. It's a bit weird for me as your humble end user to see that a (too) new version of gcc apparently is upgraded to - normally, when a package is available in different versions simultaneously, it's explicitly named - e.g. gcc3 or something. > Calling "gcc" or "cc" will use gcc-2.95. You need to set CC=gcc-3.0 > to actually use the new compiler. So the warning is pretty accurate. Okay, the text scrolled away long ago - anyway, I think the message could reflect this fact more clearly. I certainly missed it (but may be guilty of not reading it closely enough) > However, after the next upgrade, it wont give a warning any longer. gcc 3.0 will be the default? Anyway, thanks for your help, and apologies for any unnecessary trouble! -kzm -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants