Your message dated Sun,  6 May 2001 21:34:46 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcc-2.95.4-0.010506
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2001 18:30:49 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 26 13:30:49 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from meije.iut2.upmf-grenoble.fr [193.55.51.34] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 14sqXQ-00042L-00; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 13:30:48 -0500
Received: from pc-dg-116-1.iut2.upmf-grenoble.fr ([193.55.51.153] ident=mail)
        by meije.iut2.upmf-grenoble.fr with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
        id 14sqWu-0001ki-00; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 20:30:16 +0200
Received: from bonnaud by pc-dg-116-1.iut2.upmf-grenoble.fr with local (Exim 
3.22 #1 (Debian))
        id 14sqWp-0001RS-00; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 20:30:11 +0200
From: Laurent Bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gpc-2.95 error in prerm
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.15
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.15
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 20:30:08 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Laurent Bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: gpc-2.95
Version: 1:2.95.4-0.010424
Severity: normal

Hi,

here is the error :

# apt-get install --reinstall gpc-2.95
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 8  not 
upgraded.
2 packages not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B/1256kB of archives. After unpacking 0B will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] 
(Reading database ... 289066 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace gpc-2.95 1:2.95.4-0.010424 (using 
.../gpc-2.95_2.95.4-0.010424_i386.deb) ...
rm: `/usr/share/doc/gpc-2.95' is a directory
Unpacking replacement gpc-2.95 ...


Curiously, /var/lib/dpkg/info/gpc-2.95.prerm contains twice the same chunk of
code and rm lacks the -r option :

# Automatically added by dh_installdocs
if [ \( "$1" = "upgrade" -o "$1" = "remove" \) -a -L /usr/doc/gpc-2.95 ]; then
        rm -f /usr/doc/gpc-2.95
fi
# End automatically added section
# Automatically added by dh_installdocs
if [ \( "$1" = "upgrade" -o "$1" = "remove" \) -a -L /usr/doc/gpc-2.95 ]; then
        rm -f /usr/doc/gpc-2.95
fi
# End automatically added section


-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux pc-dg-116-1 2.4.3-pentiumiii #1 Mon Apr 16 12:47:25 EST 2001 i686

Versions of packages gpc-2.95 depends on:
ii  gcc-2.95               1:2.95.4-0.010424 The GNU C compiler.               
ii  gpc                    1:2.95.3-7        The GNU Pascal compiler.          
ii  libc6                  2.2.2-4           GNU C Library: Shared libraries an


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 95358-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 May 2001 19:38:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 06 14:38:43 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 14wUMd-0002wJ-00; Sun, 06 May 2001 14:38:43 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
        by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA19773;
        Sun, 6 May 2001 21:34:46 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id VAA16935;
        Sun, 6 May 2001 21:34:46 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sun,  6 May 2001 21:34:46 +0200 (MEST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed in gcc-2.95.4-0.010506
X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs  Lucid
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

gcc-2.95 (2.95.4.ds1-0.010506) unstable; urgency=low

  * Fix build problem. That was a bug in the rules files, exposed
    by dpkg-1.9's changed dpkg-buildpackage script. Thanks to Roderich Schupp.
    Fixes #96436.

gcc-2.95 (2.95.4.ds1-0.010502) unstable; urgency=low

  * Update fsirl patch to 010501 (fixes #95955, #95969, #95978).
    Fixes building of glibc.
  * Apparently we do have a problem with dpkg-dev-1.9, which does
    create control files with missing 'Architecture:' lines. Fixes
    are welcome.
  * debian/gpc-2.95.prerm: Fix typo (#95358).
  * Disable fsirl patch for alpha again.
  * Update date in gcc version string to be able to identify the
    exact Debian version.
  * Now that gcj-3.0 is in the archives, disable building gcj-2.95.


Reply via email to