[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | > | > | C++ allows the word 'typename' after a 'using' directive. _The C++ Pro | > gramming Language_ (third edition) [Stroustrup], section A.7 (Grammar/Declara | > tions) defines the using directive: | > | using-declaration: | > | "using" "typename"(opt) "::"(opt) nested-name-specifier | > | unqualified-id ";" | > | > The C++ grammar is not context-free, you cannot deduce construct | > validity just from pure grammar productions. | | OK, fine. The question remains: is this a legal construct, or not?
The constructs you sent were all ill-formed. See 14.6/5 of the C++ definition text. -- Gaby
