Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2001 23:36:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed with gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds7-0pre010609)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jun 2001 02:01:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 09 21:01:24 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 64-214-247-150.dsl1.roc.gblx.net (phoenix.overdue.net)
[::ffff:64.214.247.150]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 158uXX-0000k9-00; Sat, 09 Jun 2001 21:01:19 -0500
Received: by phoenix.overdue.net (Postfix, from userid 1002)
id 1EDAB3085A; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 02:00:20 +0000 (UTC)
From: Lazarus Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gcc-3.0-base: [Press RETURN to continue]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.9
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 02:00:20 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcc-3.0-base
Version: 1:3.0-0pre010526
Severity: important
2) This bug makes the package unsuitable for a stable Debian release.
The package should be removed from a stable distribution if this
bug is not fixed.
This package halts the upgrade process, hanging while awaiting keyboard input.
This means daemons are stopped while awaiting keyboard input.
This is probably also a security issue, come to think of it, due to that.
If you want a rude message of this sort, why not "debconf" it, so that
it won't come up while the system is unattended? That's what debconf is
for, right ... having the intervention-required messages all together,
so the actual installation and postinst can be done without the need
for hours of babysitting the system (on a slow box such as this?)
Just imagine if the BTS had a
[Press RETURN to continue]
that awaited a given maintainer to intervene before the next bug could
be processed. My MTA was down while this sat on the console, so it's
maybe not as far-fetched as it seems. :-/
Well, enough rhetoric. This is unacceptable. Debconf is there for
a reason. Why not use it?
-- System Information
Debian Release: post-2.2
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 100358-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jun 2001 21:39:33 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 10 16:39:33 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [::ffff:130.149.17.13]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 159Cvk-0005gu-00; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 16:39:32 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA00310;
Sun, 10 Jun 2001 23:36:29 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f5ALaTr17329;
Sun, 10 Jun 2001 23:36:29 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 23:36:29 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed with gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds7-0pre010609)
X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds7-0pre010609) unstable; urgency=low
* Fix build dependency for the hurd (#99164).
* Update patches for recent (010609) CVS sources.
* Disable java on powerpc (link error in libjava).
* gcc-3.0-base.postinst: Don't prompt for non-interactive installs (#100110).
as well the doublette #100358.
