Your message dated Sat, 14 Jul 2001 01:42:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#105102: Build failure on ia64 (at least)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2001 05:43:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 14 00:43:08 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from atlrel1.hp.com [::ffff:156.153.255.210]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15LICq-00029o-00; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 00:43:08 -0500
Received: from security.hp.com (cranston.fc.hp.com [15.1.44.224])
by atlrel1.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25EE0A7F
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 01:43:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by security.hp.com (Postfix, from userid 23683)
id E41C218735; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 23:43:06 -0600 (MDT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Build failure on ia64 (at least)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 23:43:06 -0600 (MDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (LaMont Jones)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcc-3.0
Version: 3.0.ds9-4
Priority: serious
Filing this serious because hppa plans to release with woody. As the
Debian Architecture Bug Squash party continues this weekend, it is quite
likely that additional info and/or patches may be added to this defect.
The following build failure occured on ia64 (using gcc 2.96):
See http://people.debian.org/~willy/common_bugs.html for more background
information, and some additional information on deciphering the sometimes
cryptic buildd database entries.
If the bug is gcc 3.0 errors, then it is quite likely reproducable on
other platforms. With gcc 3.0, of course.
If the comment is about config.{guess,sub} then they're out of date,
see the current autotools-dev package.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux ia 2.4.5rgh1 #1 Sun Jun 24 20:39:18 MDT 2001 ia64 unknown
devel/gcc-3.0_3.0.ds9-4 by bdale-ia64 [standard:out-of-date]
Reasons for failing:
[Category: none]
dep-wait on dejagnu needs expect, probably should be built by hand anyway
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 105102-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2001 08:42:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 14 03:42:21 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com (nevyn.them.org) [::ffff:12.44.186.158]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15LL0H-0007RS-00; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 03:42:21 -0500
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 15LL0K-00081M-00; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 01:42:24 -0700
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 01:42:24 -0700
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#105102: Build failure on ia64 (at least)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.16i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, Jul 13, 2001
at 11:43:06PM -0600
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 11:43:06PM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote:
> Package: gcc-3.0
> Version: 3.0.ds9-4
> Priority: serious
>
> Filing this serious because hppa plans to release with woody. As the
> Debian Architecture Bug Squash party continues this weekend, it is quite
> likely that additional info and/or patches may be added to this defect.
>
> The following build failure occured on ia64 (using gcc 2.96):
> See http://people.debian.org/~willy/common_bugs.html for more background
> information, and some additional information on deciphering the sometimes
> cryptic buildd database entries.
>
> If the bug is gcc 3.0 errors, then it is quite likely reproducable on
> other platforms. With gcc 3.0, of course.
>
> If the comment is about config.{guess,sub} then they're out of date,
> see the current autotools-dev package.
>
> -- System Information
> Debian Release: testing/unstable
> Kernel Version: Linux ia 2.4.5rgh1 #1 Sun Jun 24 20:39:18 MDT 2001 ia64
> unknown
>
> devel/gcc-3.0_3.0.ds9-4 by bdale-ia64 [standard:out-of-date]
> Reasons for failing:
> [Category: none]
> dep-wait on dejagnu needs expect, probably should be built by hand anyway
LaMont: please, in the future, DO NOT file bugs blindly like this.
That's not a bug in the package, it's a build problem on ia64. Come
back when expect is built and you've tried gcc-3.0 by hand.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
