Your message dated Fri, 20 Jul 2001 18:28:52 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#106049: gccbug doesn't handle mail addresses properly
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jul 2001 00:05:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 20 19:05:50 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (smtp01.eresmas.com) [::ffff:62.81.160.176]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15NkHF-0008Jj-00; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 19:05:50 -0500
Received: from femto ([62.83.5.122]) by smtp01.eresmas.com
(Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id GGSMYB00.GDV for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 21 Jul 2001 00:39:47 +0200
Received: from eric by femto with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 15NiCQ-0000hR-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 23:52:42 +0200
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 23:52:42 +0200
From: Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gccbug doesn't handle mail addresses properly
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
X-Echelon: FBI CIA NSA Handgun Assault Atomic Bomb Heroin Drug Terrorism
Sender: Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcc-3.0
Version: 3.0-1
I tried to report a bug in gcc from paer.d.o using the automated gccbug tool.
It didn't work properly. See the rejection message I received below. Basically
the To: field isn't properly generated.
Thanks.
----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail failure - malformed recipient address
A message that you sent contained one or more recipient addresses that were
incorrectly constructed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] debian-gcc@lists.debian.org: malformed address:
debian-gcc@lists.debian.org
may not follow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This address has been ignored. The other addresses in the message were
syntactically valid and have been passed on for an attempt at delivery.
------ This is a copy of your message, including all the headers.
------ No more than 100K characters of the body are included.
Received: from ericvb by paer.debian.org with local (Exim 3.22 1 (Debian))
id 15NZRc-0006oK-00; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 06:31:48 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] debian-gcc@lists.debian.org
Subject: gcc segfaults on parisc64 when using -O3
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-send-pr-version: 3.113
X-GNATS-Notify:
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 06:31:48 -0600
>Submitter-Id: net-debian
>Originator:
>Organization: andago.com
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: gcc segfault on parisc64 when using -O3
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Category: ?
>Class: rejects-legal
>Release: 3.0 (Debian) (Debian testing/unstable)
>Environment:
System: Linux paer 2.4.0-pa43 #8 Tue Jun 26 13:12:21 MDT 2001 parisc64 unknown
Architecture: parisc64
host: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
build: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
target: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,f77,proto,objc
--prefix=/usr --infodir=/share/info --mandir=/share/man --enable-shared
--with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --with-system-zlib --enable-long-long --enable-nls
--without-x --without-included-gettext --disable-checking
--enable-threads=posix --with-cpp-install-dir=bin --enable-objc-gc hppa-linux
>Description:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/crafty-18.10$ gcc -save-temps -Wall -pipe
-D_REENTRANT -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -DCOMPACT_ATTACKS -DUSE_ATTACK_FUNCTIONS
-DFAST -DMUTEX -DSMP -DCPUS=4 -DLINUX -c epd.c
gcc: Warning: -pipe ignored because -save-temps specified
epd.c: In function `EPDNewGPM':
epd.c:340: Internal error: Segmentation fault
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/crafty-18.10$ gcc -Wall -pipe -D_REENTRANT
-O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -DCOMPACT_ATTACKS -DUSE_ATTACK_FUNCTIONS -DFAST
-DMUTEX -DSMP -DCPUS=4 -DLINUX -c epd.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/crafty-18.10$
>How-To-Repeat:
Try above commands
>Fix:
no solution known
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Eric VAN BUGGENHAUT
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 106049-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jul 2001 01:29:00 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 20 20:28:59 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com (nevyn.them.org) [::ffff:12.44.186.158]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15NlZj-0001Pm-00; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 20:28:59 -0500
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 15NlZc-0006BW-00; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 18:28:52 -0700
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 18:28:52 -0700
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#106049: gccbug doesn't handle mail addresses properly
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.16i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, Jul 20, 2001
at 11:52:42PM +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 11:52:42PM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> Package: gcc-3.0
> Version: 3.0-1
>
> I tried to report a bug in gcc from paer.d.o using the automated gccbug tool.
> It didn't work properly. See the rejection message I received below. Basically
> the To: field isn't properly generated.
This was fixed in gcc-3.0 3.0-2:
* Correct mail address in gccbug (#101743).
3.0-4 should be recompiled for hppa.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
