Your message dated Wed, 1 Aug 2001 22:20:59 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line package removed from unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2001 10:03:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 30 05:03:48 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de [::ffff:129.217.4.42]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15R9ts-0001lr-00; Mon, 30 Jul 2001 05:03:48 -0500
Received: from peano.cs.uni-dortmund.de (peano.cs.uni-dortmund.de
[129.217.28.154]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id MAA23166 for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 30 Jul 2001 12:03:30 +0200 (MES)
Received: from peano.cs.uni-dortmund.de (localhost.cs.Uni-Dortmund.DE
[127.0.0.1])
by localhost.cs.Uni-Dortmund.DE (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7/Debian
8.12.0.Beta7-1) with ESMTP id f6UA3TpW015130
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 30 Jul 2001 12:03:29 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 (debian 2.3.1-1) with nmh-1.0.4+dev
From: Karsten Tinnefeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Karsten Tinnefeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-uri: http://tinnefeld.com
X-face: *sXD#NpiH+[WIRUfGB;twtnVo=k{4Ev$$s75_L<y).1]M"|!K4iVnU>f~Sw%(A74
`N'EtJI[Z{P'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'?UjF<V~o6IPIoDy=$0rbyj]H6!zm$)sd,/dgzY_D
OfEmPcE*'/QcqzO+sR4yZ0fSruqLZ#C8i?Ce<`w(0J&h)Y<T7%QV-L<C^WKLitv3"Fl&YO>
~_B1l-`S:F>h~!,!|ow*.'@nzW.ADJ06j/Mj5NVp3
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: file sharing conflict with libgcj0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 12:03:29 +0200
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libgcj300-dev
Version: 1:3.0-0pre010403
The package does not have "libgcj0" in its "conflicts" list, but shares
the file `/usr/lib/libgcj.spec' with this package, at least regarding
libgcj0_2.95.1-5_i386.deb.
As both packages contain shared libraries, just adding the conflicts
rule would only be the easiest, but not the best method. On the other
hand, one might consider a v0 library preliminary enough that noone has
linked to it anyway. Hmm.
--
Karsten Tinnefeld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Silberknapp 68 T +49 231 773812
44227 Dortmund, Deutschland M +49 172 2877586 F +49 231 9710384
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 107079-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Aug 2001 20:27:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 01 15:27:04 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [::ffff:130.149.17.13]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15S2a7-0005GC-00; Wed, 01 Aug 2001 15:27:03 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA27041
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 1 Aug 2001 22:20:59 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f71KKxX07913;
Wed, 1 Aug 2001 22:20:59 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 22:20:59 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: package removed from unstable
X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libgcj0 and libgcj300-dev are removed from unstable (or will be
soon). please remove them manually for now.
