On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 09:15:00AM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote: > > I don't think you're arguing the right side. Look at my message - I > > don't know what the poster did, but _MY_ installed g++ v3.0 declares it > > invalid. > > And I assume everybody else's does so, as well: on my system, both g++ > 2.95 and 3.1 20011009 complain about your code (where the constant is > 4), and accept the code of the poster (where the constant is 0). > > So it has always been this way, for a reasonable definition of "always".
Oops. I understand what's going on now; thanks. > Welcome to C++. .... -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
