Your message dated Wed, 28 Nov 2001 18:24:45 +0000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line submitter requested close has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2001 19:37:36 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 23 14:37:36 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from higgs.physik.uni-mainz.de [134.93.128.134] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15w7Ml-0004wB-00; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 14:37:35 -0500 Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by higgs.physik.uni-mainz.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id VAA07176 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 21:37:33 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: higgs.physik.uni-mainz.de: kreckel owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 21:37:33 +0200 (CEST) From: "Richard B. Kreckel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Debian's g++-3.0 forgets to generate some code. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: g++-3.0 Version: 1:3.0.2-0pre011014 Severity: important Summary: It seems like some bug crept into Debian's gcc-3.0. The bug does not seem to be present upstream. This bug renders the CLN package unlinkable with our compiler. The following piece of code is extracted from CLN's PROVIDE/REQUIRE mechanism for setting up global objects: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ extern "C" void module__prin_globals__firstglobalfun () {} extern "C" void module__prin_globals__ctorend (void); extern "C" void module__prin_globals__dtorend (void); __asm__("\t.globl _GLOBAL__I_module__prin_globals__firstglobalfun"); __asm__("\t.globl _GLOBAL__D_module__prin_globals__firstglobalfun"); static int module__prin_globals__counter; struct module__prin_globals__controller { inline module__prin_globals__controller () { if (module__prin_globals__counter++) { __asm__ ("jmp %*%0" : : "rm" ((void*)( module__prin_globals__ctorend ))) ; } } inline ~module__prin_globals__controller () { __asm__ ("\n" "" "module__" "prin_globals" "__dtorend" ":") ; } }; static module__prin_globals__controller module__prin_globals__ctordummy; ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ When compiled with `g++-3.0 -O -c' the resulting .o file starts with U _GLOBAL__D_module__prin_globals__firstglobalfun 00000058 T _GLOBAL__I_module__prin_globals__firstglobalfun Rather, there should be a text section for `_GLOBAL__D_module_...' as well, in the following fashion: 00000070 T _GLOBAL__D_module__prin_globals__firstglobalfun 00000050 T _GLOBAL__I_module__prin_globals__firstglobalfun I am able to generate the above (correct) symbols with either RedHat's `g++3' or with the snapshot `gcc-3.0.2-20011014' bootstrapped on a Woody system with no configure-options other than --prefix. The erroneously missing symbols can also be reproducsed with Debian's version 1:3.0.2-0pre010922. Also, analyzing the output directly with `cc1plus', one finds that we cannot blame binutils. The code is simply not generated with Debian's compiler: $ /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.0.2/cc1plus -quiet -dumpbase foo.cpp -O -version -o foo.s foo.cpp GNU CPP version 3.0.2 20011014 (Debian prerelease) (cpplib) (i386 Linux/ELF) GNU C++ version 3.0.2 20011014 (Debian prerelease) (i386-linux) compiled by GNU C version 3.0.2 20011014 (Debian prerelease). $ grep _D_ foo.s # WRONG .globl _GLOBAL__D_module__prin_globals__firstglobalfun $ grep _I_ foo.s # okay .globl _GLOBAL__I_module__prin_globals__firstglobalfun .type _GLOBAL__I_module__prin_globals__firstglobalfun,@function _GLOBAL__I_module__prin_globals__firstglobalfun: .size _GLOBAL__I_module__prin_globals__firstglobalfun,.Lfe4-_GLOBAL__I_module__prin_globals__firstglobalfun .long _GLOBAL__I_module__prin_globals__firstglobalfun Whereas it is generated fine with the hand-bootstrapped compiler: $ /home/kreckel/projects/gcc-3.0.2-20011014/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.0.2/cc1plus -quiet -dumpbase foo.cpp -O -version -o foo.s foo.cpp GNU CPP version 3.0.2 20011014 (prerelease) (cpplib) (i386 Linux/ELF) GNU C++ version 3.0.2 20011014 (prerelease) (i686-pc-linux-gnu) compiled by GNU C version 3.0.2 20011014 (prerelease). $ grep _D_ foo.s # okay .globl _GLOBAL__D_module__prin_globals__firstglobalfun .type _GLOBAL__D_module__prin_globals__firstglobalfun,@function _GLOBAL__D_module__prin_globals__firstglobalfun: .size _GLOBAL__D_module__prin_globals__firstglobalfun,.Lfe4-_GLOBAL__D_module__prin_globals__firstglobalfun .long _GLOBAL__D_module__prin_globals__firstglobalfun $ grep _I_ foo.s #okay .globl _GLOBAL__I_module__prin_globals__firstglobalfun .type _GLOBAL__I_module__prin_globals__firstglobalfun,@function _GLOBAL__I_module__prin_globals__firstglobalfun: .size _GLOBAL__I_module__prin_globals__firstglobalfun,.Lfe3-_GLOBAL__I_module__prin_globals__firstglobalfun .long _GLOBAL__I_module__prin_globals__firstglobalfun All this suggests that some bad patch went into Debian's gcc-3.0 or that some configure options break the compiler. What is it?!? Regards -richy. -- .''`. Richard B. Kreckel : :' : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> `. `' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> `- <http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/> --------------------------------------- Received: (at 116823-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Nov 2001 18:24:46 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 28 12:24:46 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk (www.linux.org.uk) [195.92.249.252] (exim) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 1699O2-0008O2-00; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 12:24:46 -0600 Received: from willy by www.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 3.33 #5) id 1699O1-0005Li-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 18:24:45 +0000 Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 18:24:45 +0000 From: Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: submitter requested close Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the last message to this bug (dated wed 7th november), Richard Kreckel decided the bug was in CLN and requested this bug be closed. -- Revolutions do not require corporate support.