Your message dated Thu, 29 Nov 2001 15:31:22 +0000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line notabug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Oct 2001 06:07:53 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 24 01:07:53 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from femail40.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.254.60.34] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15wHCj-00019y-00; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 01:07:53 -0500 Received: from pizza.saltlk1.ut.home.com ([24.13.134.126]) by femail40.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 23:07:47 -0700 Received: from pat by pizza.saltlk1.ut.home.com with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15wHJS-0001yH-00; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 00:14:50 -0600 From: Patrick Tullmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: g++-3.0: nested type converter in initializer confuses gcc X-Reportbug-Version: 1.31 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.31 Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 00:14:50 -0600 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Patrick Tullmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: g++-3.0 Version: 1:3.0.2-0pre010922 Severity: normal File: /usr/bin/g++-3.0 The attached file demonstrates that g++ (in Debian/testing) barfs on a nested int conversion of a static function in a constructor expecting an int. (See the main local variable 'broken' in the example.) My expectation is that the 'broken' line is most similar to the 'alsoWorks' declaration. The error message from g++ is: gcc-bug-constructor.cc:36: request for member `field' in `broken', which is of non-aggregate type `Foo ()(int (*)())' My expectation is that 'broken' should be of type `Foo'. I wouldn't put it past the C++ spec that 'broken' really isn't what I intend, but even if that is the case, I can't imagine that the type in the error message is right. (I read that as a function returning a Foo that takes a pointer to an int-returning function as its only argument.) There are lots of workarounds (all the other Foo declarations in main() have the same result), so this really isn't critical. The g++ v2.95.4 which is also installed on my system reports the same error message.... *** /home/pat/tmp/gcc-bug-constructor.cc #include <cstdio> // return type doesn't seem to matter static long returnLong(void) { return 0; } class Foo { public: int field; Foo(int f) : field(f) { } }; int main(int, char **) { int ts = int(returnLong()); Foo works(ts); Foo alsoWorks(static_cast<int>(returnLong())); Foo stillWorks(returnLong()); Foo yetStillFine(int(0)); // This is the problematic line: Foo broken(int(returnLong())); // Just make sure they're used: printf("%d, %d, %d, %d, %d\n", works.field, alsoWorks.field, stillWorks.field, yetStillFine.field, broken.field); } -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux pizza 2.4.7 #1 Tue Jul 24 00:58:43 MDT 2001 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages g++-3.0 depends on: ii gcc-3.0 1:3.0.2-0pre010922 The GNU C compiler. ii gcc-3.0-base 1:3.0.2-0pre010922 The GNU Compiler Collection (base ii libc6 2.2.4-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libstdc++3-dev 1:3.0.2-0pre010922 The GNU stdc++ library version 3 ( --------------------------------------- Received: (at 116875-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Nov 2001 15:31:23 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 29 09:31:23 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk (www.linux.org.uk) [195.92.249.252] (exim) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 169T9n-0001Gu-00; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 09:31:23 -0600 Received: from willy by www.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 3.33 #5) id 169T9m-0007dP-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 15:31:22 +0000 Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 15:31:22 +0000 From: Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: notabug Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] problem lies in code, not the compiler. -- Revolutions do not require corporate support.