Hi, At Tue, 15 Jan 2002 01:58:36 +0100, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Note that this problem is fixed in gcc-3.0 but I think > > gcc-2.95 is important because it is the main C compiler > > for Woody. > > How many translations are there available for gcc-2.95? Please send a > patch, if you think, it's important. IMO it would be better to > concentrate on translations for the current gcc HEAD branch (the > upcoming 3.1 release).
You can see it at translation project, http://www2.iro.umontreal.ca/~pinard/po/registry.cgi?domain=gcc Currently, da 2.96.20000615, 3.0, 3.1-b20011219 fr 3.0, 3.1-b20011219 el 3.1-b20011219 ja 2.96.20000615, 3.0, 3.1-b20011219 es 2.96.20000615, 3.0, 3.1-b20011219 tr 2.96.20000615, 3.0, 3.1-b20011219 is supported. I think current gcc 3.1 cvs has these catalogs in its repository (but I can identify it to go home this night...) I fully agree with your mention. I make patches in a few days. -- gotom
