Your message dated Sun, 3 Feb 2002 17:24:12 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#110791: Problem, RC2 no longer in posession
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Aug 2001 10:48:00 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 31 05:48:00 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ha1.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au (mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au) 
[203.164.2.50] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 15clqC-0007bi-00; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 05:48:00 -0500
Received: from yggdrasil.intranet.froob.net ([203.164.92.194])
          by mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with ESMTP
          id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
          Fri, 31 Aug 2001 20:47:40 +1000
Received: from niflheim.intranet.froob.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [192.168.1.2])
        by yggdrasil.intranet.froob.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with 
ESMTP id UAA29744;
        Fri, 31 Aug 2001 20:47:39 +1000
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by niflheim.intranet.froob.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id 
UAA27593;
        Fri, 31 Aug 2001 20:47:38 +1000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Peter de Zwart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Internal compiler error (signal 11) when using -march=i686
X-Reportbug-Version: 0.54.1
X-Mailer: reportbug 0.54.1
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 20:47:38 +1000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: gcc
Version: 1:2.95.2-13
Severity: normal

While compiling libvorbis-1.0rc2 from xiphophorus (http://www.ogg.org) the
compiler got an internal compiler error (signal 11) on the following file:

lib/envelope.c

I did a "make distclean", unset CFLAGS, reconfigured the build environment and
it worked without a problem.

The problem seems to stem from the use of -march=i686

Any way that I can help?

        Pete.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux niflheim 2.4.9 #1 Fri Aug 31 15:51:30 EST 2001 i686

Versions of packages gcc depends on:
ii  binutils                    2.9.5.0.37-1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  cpp                         1:2.95.2-13  The GNU C preprocessor.           
ii  libc6                       2.1.3-18     GNU C Library: Shared libraries an


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 110791-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2002 16:28:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 03 10:28:04 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 16XPUp-0000pr-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 10:28:03 -0600
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
        by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA17388;
        Sun, 3 Feb 2002 17:24:12 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g13GOCE19841;
        Sun, 3 Feb 2002 17:24:12 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 17:24:12 +0100
To: Pete de Zwart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#110791: Problem, RC2 no longer in posession
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Pete de Zwart writes:
> I no longer have the tarball that contained the source tree that
> elicted this problem.
> 
> Perhaps it is a good idea to close this bug as I am unable to further
> persue the issue.
> 
> Anyway, let me know what happens.
> 
>       Pete de Zwart.


Reply via email to