On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 06:11:52PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > I don't think this is related to libstdc++2.10-dev (a dev package not > containing any shared libs).
As I said, the apt maintainer wasn't willing to accept the bug as their fault. Since libstdc++2.10-dev fails install and seems to cause catastophic failures with the dist-upgrade, you're second choice. > > First significant bug is: > > > > Preparing to replace libstdc++2.10-dev 1:2.95.2-13 (using > > .../libstdc++2.10-dev_1%3a2.95.4-1_i386.deb) ... > > perl: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.2' not found (required by > > /lib/libdb.so.3) > > This is NOT the first bug, why does perl print the error message? You are welcome to look through the logs in http://www.blars.org/obfucsate/ and find an earlier falure to blame if you can. dist-upgrade2.gz is the relivent one for this. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html "Text is a way we cheat time." -- Patrick Nielsen Hayden
