> Can you clarify whether this is a new failure, or one that has just gone > unnoticed previously?
The blas package has previously built (although auric is down so I can't see _which_version...). I don't know if this code changed between then and now, or if this is a new bug in g77. > I'm downgrading it to "important" on the assumption that the bug has > existed in all older versions of the compiler as well. If it's actually > a regression, please feel free to set it back to "serious"; in that > case, it would help to know what the last version was that worked. > It would also be interesting to know whether gcc-snapshot is able to > compile the code successfully. I'll work on these later tonight when I get home. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
