Your message dated 30 Mar 2002 10:27:17 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line no bug here
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Mar 2002 18:08:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 27 12:08:03 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from thunderbird.comms.unsw.edu.au [149.171.96.70] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 16qHq6-00082y-00; Wed, 27 Mar 2002 12:08:02 -0600
Received: from maillationax (dhcp103_93.ee.unsw.EDU.AU [149.171.93.103])
        by thunderbird.comms.unsw.edu.au (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id 
g2RI7w210311
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 05:07:59 +1100 (EST)
Received: from flatmax by maillationax with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 16qHn6-0006B6-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 05:04:56 +1100
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 05:04:55 +1100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: g++-3.0, result of using the : undefined symbol: __dso_handle
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
From: mffm Matt Flax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: g++-3.0
Version: 1:3.0.3-1 and 1:3.0.4-6
Severity: serious

Compilation is fine. When I try to execute, I get the following
problem :
relocation error:
undefined symbol: __dso_handle

The error literally looks like so :

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/research/fft$ ./complexFFTExample 
./complexFFTExample: relocation error:
/home/flatmax/lib/libfft.so.0.1: undefined symbol:
__dso_handle

The same error happens with anything compiled using dynamic libraries.
The same error does not exist if everything is staticaly compiled.

libfft.so.0.1 is linked like so :
ld -shared -soname libfft.so.0.1 -o libfft.so.0.1 $(OBJ)
Where the objects are compiled using the following rules :
g++-3.0 -fPIC -c source.cc

The required libraries for dynamic linking are :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/research/fft$ ldd ./complexFFTExample
        librfftw.so.2 => /usr/lib/librfftw.so.2 (0x4001d000)
        libfftw.so.2 => /usr/lib/libfftw.so.2 (0x4004b000)
        libfft.so.0.1 => /home/flatmax/lib/libfft.so.0.1 (0x4007f000)
        libstdc++.so.3 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.3 (0x4008e000)
        libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x4011f000)
        libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x40141000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40148000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)


Static linking requires the following libraries :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/research/fft$ ldd ./complexFFTExample
        librfftw.so.2 => /usr/lib/librfftw.so.2 (0x4001d000)
        libfftw.so.2 => /usr/lib/libfftw.so.2 (0x4004b000)
        libstdc++.so.3 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.3 (0x4007f000)
        libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x40110000)
        libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x40132000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40139000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)


thanks
Matt
-- 
http://mffm.darktech.org

WSOLA TimeScale Audio Mod  : http://mffmtimescale.sourceforge.net/
Vector Bass          : http://mffmvectorbass.sourceforge.net/
Multimedia Time Code : http://mffmtimecode.sourceforge.net/


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 140186-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2002 10:27:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 30 04:27:19 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mta01-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.41] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 16rG4t-0004r5-00; Sat, 30 Mar 2002 04:27:19 -0600
Received: from kc.cam.armlinux.org ([62.253.135.163])
          by mta01-svc.ntlworld.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP
          id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
          for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
          Sat, 30 Mar 2002 10:27:17 +0000
Received: from localhost
        ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain ident=pb)
        by kc.cam.armlinux.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
        id 16rG4r-000081-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 30 Mar 2002 10:27:17 +0000
Subject: no bug here
From: Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.2 
Date: 30 Mar 2002 10:27:17 +0000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The submitter's own code was in error.

p.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to