On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 08:54:06AM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote: > Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I would like to get feedback, on which alternative to base the gcc-3.1 > > packages: > > > > a) 3.1 as to be released (without dwarf2 support) > > As Redhat has demonstrated in the past, it is highly desirable that > the distributed gcc is based on a released gcc as close as possible. > If there are serious problems in gcc 3.1-as-released, work with gcc > maintainers to fix them in 3.1.1.
Completely seconded. I want the collection of patches that distributors ship with GCC to shrink over time, not grow... -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
