Your message dated Sun, 2 Jun 2002 01:05:18 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line don't package egcs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Oct 2000 23:09:00 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 09 18:09:00 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (romana.cocoranch.com) [::ffff:207.215.68.163]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13im2W-0005y5-00; Mon, 09 Oct 2000 18:09:00 -0500
Received: from hajhouse by romana.cocoranch.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1
(Debian))
id 13ilzp-0002G0-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 09 Oct 2000 16:06:13 -0700
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 16:06:12 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: wishlist: add package for egcs/Alpha as an alternative
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
From: Henry House <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: g++
Version: 1:2.95.2-15
Please consider adding packages of egcs as an alternative to gcc/g++. It
would make life easier on the Alpha platform, which has a buggy gcc that
cannot compile Qt2.2 (it dies with an internal compiler error). This
is a known gcc/g++ bug on Alphas according to Troll Tech. This bug is
apparently not found in egcs-2.91.66, which compiles Qt2.2 fine (tested
on a RedHat/Alpha machine).
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 74426-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jun 2002 23:07:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 01 18:07:35 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17EHyA-0008Rk-00; Sat, 01 Jun 2002 18:07:35 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA12840
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 2 Jun 2002 01:05:19 +0200 (MET DST)
Resent-From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id g51N5Ie25731;
Sun, 2 Jun 2002 01:05:18 +0200 (MEST)
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 01:05:18 +0200 (MEST)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 01:05:18 +0200
Resent-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: don't package egcs
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with gcc-3.1 and -3.0 in unstable, I'll close this report ...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
