On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 10:27:16AM +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 04:06:27PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > >Description: > > running htdig on the installed set of html docs shows some > > broken/non-existing links: > > The files lwg-active.html and lwg-defects.html are copied verbatim from > the standard committee site. As most of the links in those pages are > relative links to other pages on that site, which aren't included in > libstdc++, they don't work.
And in fact this is documented in ext/howto.html, which is the entry point to the LWG files. > The other broken links all appear to be for .txt files, which are included > with the sources. They should be ok, but it looks like they've not been > included with the HTML files. I checked the libstdc++5-doc package just now. They have been included, but (in too-stringent accordance with Debian policy regarding /usr/share/doc files) they've been gzipped. Not Our Problem. :-) Phil -- I would therefore like to posit that computing's central challenge, viz. "How not to make a mess of it," has /not/ been met. - Edsger Dijkstra, 1930-2002