Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > tags 170994 + wontfix > tags 170994 + fixed > retitle 170994 [fixed in 3.x] ICE on __builtin_memset(s, 0, -1) (2.95 only) > thanks > > marking this report as all other 2.95 reports. Is there a reason you > cannot use gcc-3.2 for boostraps?
No, not really. I just thought if we switch the default compiler from
2.95 to 3.3 without 3.2 as an intermediary step, the buildds would
trip over it.
--
Falk
