Your message dated Sat, 28 Dec 2002 12:50:14 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gcj-3.2 provides javac wrapper
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 May 2002 21:17:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 31 16:17:44 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail0.ewetel.de [212.6.122.12] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 17DtmJ-0005Tt-00; Fri, 31 May 2002 16:17:43 -0500
Received: from mail.konqueror.de (dsl-ler-213-170-182-047.ewetel.net 
[213.170.182.47])
        by mail0.ewetel.de (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g4VLH8ob027989;
        Fri, 31 May 2002 23:17:08 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from asterix.konqueror.de (asterix.konqueror.de [192.168.1.100])
        by mail.konqueror.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id F1248AEF0; Fri, 31 May 2002 23:17:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mkoch by asterix.konqueror.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 17Dtlh-0000Ij-00; Fri, 31 May 2002 23:17:05 +0200
Subject: gcj-3.1 should provide /etc/alternatives/javac
From: "Michael Koch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.30
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 23:17:05 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-CheckCompat: OK
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: gcj-3.1
Version: 1:3.1-2
Severity: normal


gcj-3.1 should provide /etc/alternatives/javac


-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux asterix 2.4.18-k7 #1 Sun Apr 14 13:19:11 EST 2002 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ignored: LC_ALL set)

Versions of packages gcj-3.1 depends on:
ii  gcc-3.1                       1:3.1-2    The GNU C compiler.
ii  gcc-3.1-base                  1:3.1-2    The GNU Compiler Collection (base 
ii  java-common                   0.14       Base of all Java packages
ii  libc6                         2.2.5-6    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1                       1:3.1-2    GCC support library.
ii  libgcj3                       1:3.1-2    Java runtime library for use with 
ii  libgcj3-dev                   1:3.1-2    Java development headers and stati
ii  zlib1g                        1:1.1.4-1  compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 143912-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2002 11:53:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 28 05:53:30 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 18SFWz-0000aZ-00; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 05:53:29 -0600
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
        by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA20035;
        Sat, 28 Dec 2002 12:50:14 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id gBSBoE313813;
        Sat, 28 Dec 2002 12:50:14 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 12:50:14 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gcj-3.2 provides javac wrapper
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
        tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
        version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

gcj-3.2 provides javac wrapper, closing the reports.


Reply via email to