Camm Maguire writes: > Greetings! > > Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > [keeping all the people in the CC] > > > > Scanning the reports, I see Matthew Wilcox beeing asked about: > > > > > > In either case, I will need a knowledgeable hppa person to advise, > > > > discuss and help generate patches for this to get fixed any time soon. > > > > Gcl can build its own bfd library, so patches here can be simply > > > > incorporated. > > > > > > willy would be a good target. I'm going to be out of town for a couple > > > of weeks, but (if it's still pending) I'd be happy to help when I get > > > back. > > > > Camm, another try with the current (20021227) gcc-snapshot package > > (now branched to become gcc-3.3 sometime). > > > > > > I forget which of the several gcc difficulties I'd been having with > GCL on hppa to which this note referred.
yes, the report got long ... > In any case, I see I'm going to have a problem with 3.3: > > /home/camm/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/lib/gcc-lib/hppa-linux/3.3/include/varargs.h:4:2: > #error "GCC no longer implements <varargs.h>." > /home/camm/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/lib/gcc-lib/hppa-linux/3.3/include/varargs.h:5:2: > #error "Revise your code to use <stdarg.h>." > > Fixing this will take considerable effort. Is there a work around to > get varargs under 3.3? I don't think so: 2002-07-15 Zack Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * ginclude/varargs.h: Replace with stub which issues #error. * ginclude/stdarg.h: __builtin_stdarg_start is renamed __builtin_va_start. [...] * doc/invoke.texi, doc/sourcebuild.texi, doc/tm.texi, doc/trouble.texi: Remove references to GCC-provided <varargs.h>.