Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2003 18:29:33 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing report, no feedback
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2002 17:11:56 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 17 11:11:55 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from carrier.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de [129.187.181.4] (postfix)
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 18OLG7-0000yc-00; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:11:55 -0600
Received: from blofeld.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de 
(blofeld.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de [129.187.181.82])
        by carrier.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 
14E217E9
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:11:54 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:11:54 +0100 (CET)
From: Gudrun Hiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: g77 cernlib doesnt link properly since a few days / resubmit with
 package name g77
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0
        tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_PINE
        version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 


Package: g77

Hi,

we have Debian version
||/ Name           Version        Description
+++-==============-==============-============================================
ii  apt            0.5.4          Advanced front-end for dpkg

and I run g77 fortran compiler (both version 3.0 and 2.95 have the same
problem).

I could link the cernlib packages succesfully last Friday (Dec 13, 2002)
but failed to do so today, without changing commands or software.
I recall the cernlib stuff:
Package name    : cernlib
Version         : 2002.04.26 (the latest)
Upstream Author : CERN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL             : http://wwwinfo.cern.ch/asd/cernlib/
Description     : Suite of physics data analysis tools and libraries


As of last Friday (13.12.02), the command
g77 -o ofile fortranfile.f -lmathlib

succesfully linked, 3 days later various errormessages (included below)
appear, probably because the compiler doesnt link automatically to
standard libs anymore.

What happend to debian over the weekend ?

Best, and thanks
Gudrun

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Gudrun Hiller                             fon: +49 89 2180 4552
LMU Munich   Sektion Physik               fax: +49 89 2180 4031
Theresienstr. 37, Rm 322
D-80333 Munich
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Errormessages:


/usr/lib/libpacklib.so.0: undefined reference to `s_wdue'
/usr/lib/libpacklib.so.0: undefined reference to `s_rdue'
/usr/lib/libpacklib.so.0: undefined reference to `l_ge'
/usr/lib/libpacklib.so.0: undefined reference to `e_wdue'
/usr/lib/libpacklib.so.0: undefined reference to `do_uio'
/usr/lib/libpacklib.so.0: undefined reference to `f_inqu'
/usr/lib/libpacklib.so.0: undefined reference to `e_rsue'
/usr/lib/libpacklib.so.0: undefined reference to `G77_lnblnk_0'
/usr/lib/libpacklib.so.0: undefined reference to `getarg_'
/usr/lib/libpacklib.so.0: undefined reference to `l_le'
/usr/lib/libpacklib.so.0: undefined reference to `l_gt'
/usr/lib/liblapack.so.2: undefined reference to `etime_'
/usr/lib/libpacklib.so.0: undefined reference to `l_lt'
/usr/lib/libpacklib.so.0: undefined reference to `s_wsue'
/usr/lib/liblapack.so.2: undefined reference to `s_cat'
/usr/lib/libpacklib.so.0: undefined reference to `e_wsue'
/usr/lib/libpacklib.so.0: undefined reference to `f_rew'
/usr/lib/libpacklib.so.0: undefined reference to `s_rsue'
/usr/lib/libpacklib.so.0: undefined reference to `e_rdue'
/usr/lib/libpacklib.so.0: undefined reference to `f_back'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status





---------------------------------------
Received: (at 173457-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Feb 2003 17:30:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 22 11:30:27 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 18mdTm-00088y-00; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 11:30:27 -0600
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
        by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA23882
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 18:29:33 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id h1MHTXA04265;
        Sat, 22 Feb 2003 18:29:33 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 18:29:33 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: closing report, no feedback
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=4.0
        tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
        version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

closing the report due to missing feedback.


Reply via email to