Your message dated Tue, 11 Mar 2003 21:00:33 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Duplicates of 184117
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Mar 2003 22:37:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 09 16:37:37 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18s9QG-0004C3-00; Sun, 09 Mar 2003 16:37:36 -0600
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA16314
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 9 Mar 2003 23:36:59 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id h29Maxv04072;
Sun, 9 Mar 2003 23:36:59 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 23:36:59 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: broken libc-dev dependencies in 1:3.2.3-0pre4 upload
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.3-0pre4
Severity: serious
A new upload is in the works.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 184119-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Mar 2003 01:58:16 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 11 19:58:15 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tomts5.bellnexxia.net (tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net)
[209.226.175.25]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18svVX-0001kS-00; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 19:58:15 -0600
Received: from crystal ([64.229.1.47]) by tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net
(InterMail vM.5.01.04.19 201-253-122-122-119-20020516) with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Tue, 11 Mar 2003 20:58:14 -0500
Received: from hsteoh by crystal with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18svXl-0005nT-00; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 21:00:33 -0500
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 21:00:33 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Duplicates of 184117
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
From: "H. S. Teoh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=4.0
tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
The broken dependency problem has already been fixed in gcj-3.2
1:3.2.3ds4-0pre5 and gcc-3.2 3.2.3-0pre5, AFAICT. Please reopen if it's
not.
T
--
I am not young enough to know everything. -- Oscar Wilde
