On Sun, 2003-03-16 at 16:24, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > If it weren't for the disk/archivespace/maintenance/PITA cost I'd > suggest binary-i686. Things being what they are, maybe we should poll > for people interested in new versions of Debian on i386; I doubt we can > drop 586, since I've seen uses of 'em recently...
I'm a user of what is basically Debian on 486.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
