Your message dated Thu, 29 May 2003 07:07:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#195130: Not A Bug.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 May 2003 21:52:00 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 28 16:52:00 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from swan.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.123]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19L8q0-0007Rx-00; Wed, 28 May 2003 16:52:00 -0500
Received: from user-0c8hfn1.cable.mindspring.com ([24.136.190.225]
helo=illuvatar)
by swan.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
id 19L8pu-0002aE-00; Wed, 28 May 2003 14:51:54 -0700
Received: from jonathan by illuvatar with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19L8pr-0000Zp-00; Wed, 28 May 2003 17:51:51 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jonathan Brandmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libgcj4-dev: missing header file: gcj/libgcj-config.h
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 17:51:50 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Jonathan Brandmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: libgcj4-dev
Version: 1:3.3-2
Severity: normal
The header file /usr/include/gcj/libgcj-config.h, required by
/usr/include/jni.h, is missing. A file search on packages.debian.org for
the unstable distribution does not find this file in any package.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux illuvatar 2.4.20 #1 Tue May 6 17:02:13 EDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US
Versions of packages libgcj4-dev depends on:
ii gcj-3.3 1:3.3-2 The GNU compiler for Java(TM)
ii libc6-dev 2.3.1-17 GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii libgcj4 1:3.3-2 Java runtime library for use with
ii zlib1g-dev 1:1.1.4-11 compression library - development
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 195130-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 May 2003 05:07:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 29 00:07:25 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zensunni.demon.nl [212.238.195.120]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19LFdJ-0007g5-00; Thu, 29 May 2003 00:07:21 -0500
Received: from ray by zensunni.demon.nl with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 19LFdI-00014J-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 29 May 2003 07:07:20 +0200
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 07:07:20 +0200
From: "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#195130: Not A Bug.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Ray at home
X-System: Debian GNU/Linux testing/unstable, kernel
2.4.212.4.21-rc3-freeswan1.99-evms1.2.1
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-17.6 required=4.0
tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 20:14:40 -0400, Jonathan Brandmeyer wrote:
> Please disregard this bug.
As you wish.
--
Ziff Davis is so obviously biased to Microsoft in almost everything they
publish, that they might as well change their company name to MS-PRAVDA.
Darryl Householder commenting on extreme PC Week FUD
(http://linuxtoday.com/story.php3?sn=21049&showcomments=flat)
