Your message dated Sat, 31 May 2003 21:16:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#195586: libstdc++5-dev is older than libstdc++5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 May 2003 18:49:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 31 13:49:01 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from uu194-7-150-119.unknown.be.uu.net (heaven.aquazul.com)
[194.7.150.119]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19MBPY-0007XH-00; Sat, 31 May 2003 13:49:01 -0500
Received: from localhost (pD9E64F8F.dip.t-dialin.net [::ffff:217.230.79.143])
(IDENT: foobar, )
by heaven with esmtp; Sat, 31 May 2003 22:03:10 +0200
Received: from hunger by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19MBPS-0004fX-00; Sat, 31 May 2003 20:48:55 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Tobias Hunger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libstdc++5-dev is older than libstdc++5
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 20:48:54 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Tobias Hunger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: libstdc++5-dev
Version: 1:3.2.3-2
Severity: normal
I hate libstdc++5 installed which is of version 3.3-2 while libstdc++5-dev is
of version 3.2.3-2. I think that is not the way it should be.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux c3po 2.4.20-1-686-crypto #1 Fri May 16 13:33:06 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Versions of packages libstdc++5-dev depends on:
pi g++-3.2 1:3.2.3-2 The GNU C++ compiler
pi gcc-3.2-base 1:3.2.3-2 The GNU Compiler Collection (base
ii libc6-dev 2.3.1-17 GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3-2 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 195586-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 May 2003 19:18:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 31 14:18:35 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19MBs8-0002lp-00; Sat, 31 May 2003 14:18:32 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA01269;
Sat, 31 May 2003 21:16:13 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id h4VJGDJ01771;
Sat, 31 May 2003 21:16:13 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 21:16:13 +0200
To: Tobias Hunger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#195586: libstdc++5-dev is older than libstdc++5
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-21.2 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_VM
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Tobias Hunger writes:
> Package: libstdc++5-dev
> Version: 1:3.2.3-2
> Severity: normal
>
> I hate libstdc++5 installed which is of version 3.3-2 while libstdc++5-dev is
> of version 3.2.3-2. I think that is not the way it should be.
This is ok. g++-3.2 depends on libstd++5-dev, g++-3.3 depends on
libstdc++5-3.3-dev. Both share the same shared library. the soname
didn't change.
