PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11052
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-03 16:52 ------- Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] [arm] ICE (segfault) compiling xfree86 > On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 04:13:09PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > > 1) Don't allow this transformation if the insns have REG_INC notes (this > > is overkill, but safe). > > This I'd recommend for 3.3, if it's affected. > > > 2) Copy any REG_INC notes from *one* of the source insns. > > This shouldn't be hard, I wouldn't expect. > > > 3) Something else I've not thought of... :-) > > Build a new REG_INC note after scanning for autoinc codes? > Is it guaranteed that noce_emit_move_insn will emit exactly one insn? R. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
