Your message dated Tue, 29 Jul 2003 22:25:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#119952: should bug #119952 be closed?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jul 2002 19:39:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 27 14:39:02 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from hank-fep8-0.inet.fi (fep08.tmt.tele.fi) [194.251.242.203]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17YXP4-0000VT-00; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 14:39:02 -0500
Received: from lappa ([80.222.87.72]) by fep08.tmt.tele.fi
(InterMail vM.5.01.03.13 201-253-122-118-113-20010918) with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 22:38:59 +0300
Received: from markuskj by lappa with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17YXP4-00035X-00; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 22:39:02 +0300
Subject: g++-3.0: c++ symlink and alternatives are not created when installing
From: "Markus Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.49
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 22:39:02 +0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Markus_J=E4rvinen?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: g++-3.0
Version: 1:3.0.4-12
Severity: normal
Alternatives for /usr/bin/c++ are not created/updated when installing g++-3.0.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux lappa 2.2.20 #1 Sat Apr 20 11:45:28 EST 2002 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages g++-3.0 depends on:
ii gcc-3.0 1:3.0.4-12 The GNU C compiler.
ii gcc-3.0-base 1:3.0.4-12 The GNU Compiler Collection (base
ii libc6 2.2.5-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libstdc++3-dev 1:3.0.4-12 The GNU stdc++ library version 3 (
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 119952-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jul 2003 20:26:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 29 15:26:35 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19hb3K-0005ZC-00; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 15:26:35 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA17686;
Tue, 29 Jul 2003 22:25:26 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id h6TKPQn21928;
Tue, 29 Jul 2003 22:25:26 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 22:25:26 +0200
To: Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#119952: should bug #119952 be closed?
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-14.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_VM
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Jochen Voss writes:
> Hello,
>
> I suggest to simply close bug #119952 and friends. It is tagged
> wontfix and you won't get many new copies, because gcc-3.0 becomes out
> of fashion, now.
fine with me. for the record here the explanation:
gcc-x.y doesn't use alternatives to make sure that the preferred
system compiler is used when calling 'gcc'. switching the compiler
may break your system (will break for C++). In most gcc-x.y versions
ABI's are different.
If you want to test gcc-x.y for a particular package,
- use CC=gcc-x.y CXX=g++-x.y when configuring/compiling a package
- make ~<user>/bin/gcc a symlink to gcc-x.y and add it to your path
- if you know what you do, there is the option to divert the gcc/g++
links.
closing the reports, adding to our karma.
