Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > your claims are as accurate as your bug reports. > > * Make gcc-3.3 the default C compiler (Thu, 15 May 2003 20:46:56 +0200) > * Bump sparc back down to 3.2 (Wed, 4 Jun 2003 11:39:53 -0400)
gcc-3.2-pre broke at the beginning of 2003 for compiling the kernel on sparc32. it got fixed at some point along the way but debian switched to gcc-3.3-pre even before there was a gcc-3.2 final. you are telling me you managed to compile a working kernel on a sparc32 around let's say april of this year? > if you don't accept toolchain bugs, stay away from unstable and > testing. if you want to help the projects, help with your time and > knowledge. we've had this discussion before (on may 2 to be precise), you little twerp. i accept bugs in general (and i've been using unstable now for about 8 years). i find it harder to deal with breaking _essential_ packages like gcc. got it? --alex-- -- | I believe the moment is at hand when, by a paranoiac and active | | advance of the mind, it will be possible (simultaneously with | | automatism and other passive states) to systematize confusion | | and thus to help to discredit completely the world of reality. |