PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11716
------- Additional Comments From rsandifo at redhat dot com 2003-08-09 09:23 ------- Subject: Re: [mips] branch out of range when building fold-const.c "doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > rsandifo at redhat dot com writes: > > Mainline gcc is supposed to get it right though. Could you attach > > the preprocessed fold-const.i file? > > hmm, it's already attached. or is this the wrong one? Ah, sorry about that. For some reason I'd assumed you were using 3.3 to cross-compile 3.3 and trunk to cross-compile trunk. But it now occurs to me that mips64-linux-gnu is new to 3.4, so I guess you were using 3.3 and trunk to compile the same version of gcc. Is that right? When you say you're building a cross compiler, is it a cross-host or a normal cross-target? It looks from bugzilla entry like it's a cross-target, i.e.: build: mips-linux-gnu host: mips-linux-gnu target: mips64-linux-gnu In other words, the compiler itself is to run on mips-linux-gnu rather than mips64-linux-gnu. Is that right? I tried building an i686-pc-linux-gnu cross mips-linux-gnu compiler from HEAD but couldn't reproduce the problem. The checkout I used was updated yesterday. Is it still a problem for you on HEAD? If so, could you tell me what configure line you used? Also, could you try both -mexplicit-relocs and -mno-explicit-relocs? Richard ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.