Your message dated Sun, 21 Sep 2003 13:00:58 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line these aren't built because they don't build has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2003 06:32:29 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 21 01:32:27 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from polaris.galacticasoftware.com [206.45.95.222] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1A0xlj-0004EX-00; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 01:32:27 -0500 Received: from mira.lan.galacticasoftware.com (mira.lan.galacticasoftware.com [192.168.53.2]) by polaris.galacticasoftware.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with SMTP id h8L6Qnps007952 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 01:26:49 -0500 Received: by mira.lan.galacticasoftware.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 21 Sep 2003 01:28:23 -0500 From: "Adam Majer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 01:28:23 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Missing libgcj-common on HPPA, MIPS, MIPSEL Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: gcc-3.3 Severity: serious *At least* libgcj-common seems to be missing from builds on HPPA, Mips, Mipsel. Package is listed as Arch: any This breaks any package on those architectures that depend on libgcj-common eg. classpath. - Adam --------------------------------------- Received: (at 211909-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2003 20:01:01 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 21 15:00:59 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from h24-77-96-253.sbm.shawcable.net (straylight.cyberhqz.com) [24.77.96.253] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1A1AOB-0006k8-00; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 15:00:59 -0500 Received: from cyberhq.internal.cyberhqz.com (cyberhq.internal.cyberhqz.com [192.168.0.2]) by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C440E54004 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 13:00:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by cyberhq.internal.cyberhqz.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7AE291B96F6; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 13:00:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 13:00:58 -0700 From: Ryan Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: these aren't built because they don't build Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) The reason gcc doesn't build gcj for some architectures is that they currently do not work. You're welcome to work on fixing it for the archs in question upstream, as these architectures don't build from source (and/or don't work at all), so they can't be built.