Your message dated Tue, 14 Oct 2003 21:51:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing report, unreproducible with gcc-2.95.4 and gcc-3.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2002 15:52:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 16 10:52:55 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from nietos.tokem.fi [195.148.41.251] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16xVGI-0004dH-00; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 10:52:54 -0500
Received: from nietos.tokem.fi ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1] (may be forged))
by nietos.tokem.fi (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -2) with ESMTP id
g3GFbgM4012221
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 18:37:42 +0300
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by nietos.tokem.fi (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -2) id g3GFbchx012217
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 18:37:38 +0300
From: Pasi Savilaakso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Authentication-Warning: nietos.tokem.fi: www-data set sender to [EMAIL
PROTECTED] using -f
Received: from 62.71.108.29 ( [62.71.108.29])
as user [EMAIL PROTECTED] by www.nietos.tokem.fi with HTTP;
Tue, 16 Apr 2002 18:37:38 +0300
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 18:37:38 +0300
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: bugs.debian.org: libc6-dev_2.2.5-4 limits.h points back to the itself
with gcc 2.95.4-14
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.0-cvs
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: bugs.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-16
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Actually no patch but workaround. Found bug when trying to compile
lirc-modules. It failed and I found out that <limits.h>
(/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.4/include/limits.h) has following
structure from line 116
#ifdef _GCC_NEXT_LIMITS_H
#include_next <limits.h> /* recurse down to the real one */
#endif
This caused compile to fail. I made workaround which worked with me
changed #include
#include_next "/usr/src/linux/include/linux/limits.h"
Tested it and worked but not a real fix, I know.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux larstech 2.4.19-pre7 #1 Tue Apr 16 15:32:35 EEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 143188-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2003 19:51:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 14 14:51:30 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A9VCb-0002H8-00; Tue, 14 Oct 2003 14:51:30 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA08239
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Oct 2003 21:51:18 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id h9EJpIcL018122;
Tue, 14 Oct 2003 21:51:18 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 21:51:18 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: closing report, unreproducible with gcc-2.95.4 and gcc-3.3
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0
tests=none
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_13
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_13
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Closing this report. Feedback was request on Thu, 2 Jan 2003. I
sucessfully built lirc-modules using 2.95.4 and 3.3.2.
