[Bug libstdc++/8610] large file support in libstdc++-v3 (std::streamoff type is 32-bit in GCC 3.2 whereas it was 64-bit in GCC 2.96)

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org]

PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8610



------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-10-22 
15:52 -------
Subject: Bug 8610

CVSROOT:        /cvs/gcc
Module name:    gcc
Changes by:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]       2003-10-22 15:51:56

Modified files:
        libstdc++-v3   : ChangeLog acinclude.m4 configure.ac acconfig.h 
                         aclocal.m4 config.h.in configure 
        libstdc++-v3/config/io: basic_file_stdio.cc 
        libstdc++-v3/include/bits: postypes.h 

Log message:
        2003-10-22  Paolo Carlini  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        
        PR libstdc++/8610
        * acinclude.m4 (GLIBCXX_CHECK_INT64_T): New macro,
        checking for the availability of int64_t.
        (GLIBCXX_CHECK_LFS): New macro, checking for LFS support.
        * configure.ac: Call here.
        * acconfig.h: Add undef for the corresponding symbols.
        * config/io/basic_file_stdio.cc (__basic_file<char>::open):
        Depending on _GLIBCXX_USE_LFS, call fopen64 or fopen.
        (__basic_file<char>::seekoff): Likewise, call lseek64 when
        available, otherwise lseek, checking the __off parameter.
        * include/bits/postypes.h: Typedef __streamoff_base_type
        to int64_t if available, otherwise long long.
        * aclocal.m4: Regenerate.
        * config.h.in: Likewise.
        * configure: Likewise.
        
        * acinclude.m4 (GLIBCXX_CHECK_POLL, GLIBCXX_CHECK_WRITEV):
        Use AC_TRY_LINK instead of AC_TRY_COMPILE.

Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.2033&r2=1.2034
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.273&r2=1.274
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/configure.ac.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.10&r2=1.11
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/acconfig.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.35&r2=1.36
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/aclocal.m4.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.287&r2=1.288
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/config.h.in.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.75&r2=1.76
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/configure.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.362&r2=1.363
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/config/io/basic_file_stdio.cc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.22&r2=1.23
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/postypes.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1&r2=1.2





------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.