Your message dated Sun, 16 Nov 2003 13:56:34 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#216849: [sparc] Re: Bug#216849: relocation overflow error
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Oct 2003 09:20:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 21 04:20:41 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp3.wanadoo.fr (mwinf0303.wanadoo.fr) [193.252.22.28] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1ABsgz-0001tz-00; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 04:20:41 -0500
Received: from AToulouse-105-1-27-60.w81-51.abo.wanadoo.fr 
(AToulouse-105-1-27-60.w81-51.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.51.5.60])
        by mwinf0303.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 3420E500097B
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:20:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from julie.vipere.noire (julie.vipere.noire [192.168.6.6])
        by AToulouse-105-1-27-60.w81-51.abo.wanadoo.fr (8.9.3p2/8.9.3/Debian 
8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id LAA32004
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:20:19 +0200
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by julie.vipere.noire (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-5) with ESMTP id 
h9L9KJAM003403
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:20:19 +0200
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:20:19 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Nemeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Thomas Nemeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: relocation overflow error
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.2 required=4.0
        tests=HAS_PACKAGE,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_21
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_21 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 3.3.2-0pre5
Severity: critical

        Hi !

        I upgraded gcc yesterday :

julie[gacc] cat /root/apt-200310201058.log | grep gcc
Inst libgcc1 [1:3.3.2-0pre4] (1:3.3.2-0pre5 Debian:testing)
Inst gcc-3.3-base [1:3.3.2-0pre4] (1:3.3.2-0pre5 Debian:testing)
Inst gcc-3.3 [1:3.3.2-0pre4] (1:3.3.2-0pre5 Debian:testing)


        I' using testing on a SS20 SMP :

julie[gacc] uname -a
Linux julie 2.4.21 #1 SMP Thu Aug 7 19:29:27 EDT 2003 sparc GNU/Linux


        Here is what I get now, as I compile my project :

julie[gacc] make
==> Building gAcc for Linux/sparc...
Making all in libgacc...
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/thomas/devel/gacc/libgacc'
gcc -c  -g3 -I/usr/include  -O2 -Wall -I. -I..   -DDEBUG_LEVEL=0 accounts.c
gcc -c  -g3 -I/usr/include  -O2 -Wall -I. -I..   -DDEBUG_LEVEL=0 categories.c
gcc -c  -g3 -I/usr/include  -O2 -Wall -I. -I..   -DDEBUG_LEVEL=0 cfgmgt.c
gcc -c  -g3 -I/usr/include  -O2 -Wall -I. -I..   -DDEBUG_LEVEL=0 comms.c
/tmp/ccRqQA9r.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccRqQA9r.s:6180: Error: relocation overflow
make[1]: *** [comms.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/thomas/devel/gacc/libgacc'
make: *** [all] Error 2

julie[gacc] gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-linux/3.3.2/specs
Configured with: ../src/configure -v
--enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,pascal,objc,ada,treelang --prefix=/usr
--mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info
--with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/3.3 --enable-shared
--with-system-zlib --enable-nls --without-included-gettext
--enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-debug
--enable-java-gc=boehm --enable-java-awt=xlib --with-cpu=v7
--enable-objc-gc sparc-linux
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.3.2 20031005 (Debian prerelease)


        The day before, the compilation was ok.


Thomas
-- 
> A l'heure actuelle, il s'est formé une sorte "d'aristocratie" de Linux
> qui essaye de maintenir ses connaissances pour elles et d'en priver les
> autres en innondant chaque débutant de documentations
-+- EF in Guide du liuxien pervers : "Comprenne qui pourra..." -+-

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 216849-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2003 13:01:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 16 07:01:39 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1ALMX4-0002e2-00; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 07:01:38 -0600
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
        by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA25002;
        Sun, 16 Nov 2003 13:56:35 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id hAGCuYXc003748;
        Sun, 16 Nov 2003 13:56:34 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 13:56:34 +0100
To: Thomas Nemeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#216849: [sparc] Re: Bug#216849: relocation overflow error
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0
        tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Thomas Nemeth writes:
>       I think we can close the bug... How should this be done ?

done


Reply via email to