Your message dated Sun, 16 Nov 2003 21:15:45 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gcc-default - build is incorrect with nmu versioning
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 May 2003 11:02:49 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 07 06:02:48 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from p50831a97.dip.t-dialin.net (extern.mail.waldi.eu.org)
[80.131.26.151] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19DMhD-0004GE-00; Wed, 07 May 2003 06:02:48 -0500
Received: by wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 94DD97423F; Wed, 7 May 2003 13:02:35 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 13:02:35 +0200
From: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gcc-default - build is incorrect with nmu versioning
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_04_23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_04_23
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: gcc-defaults
Version: 1.5
Severity: important
built packages versions are incorrect if gcc-defaults is built with nmu
versioning
| $ echo "Version: 1.5" | awk -F. '/^Version:/ {print $NF}'
| 5
| $ echo "Version: 1.5.1" | awk -F. '/^Version:/ {print $NF}'
| 1
bastian
--
What kind of love is that? Not to be loved; never to have shown love.
-- Commissioner Nancy Hedford, "Metamorphosis",
stardate 3219.8
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 192271-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2003 20:16:49 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 16 14:16:41 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ALTK4-0000cG-00; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 14:16:40 -0600
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA01430
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 21:15:46 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id hAGKFjmo026789;
Sun, 16 Nov 2003 21:15:45 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 21:15:45 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: gcc-default - build is incorrect with nmu versioning
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_99
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
won't fix this, there are plenty of gcc maintainers, who can do
regular uploads.
