Your message dated Sun, 16 Nov 2003 21:15:45 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gcc-default - build is incorrect with nmu versioning has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 May 2003 11:02:49 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 07 06:02:48 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from p50831a97.dip.t-dialin.net (extern.mail.waldi.eu.org) [80.131.26.151] (postfix) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19DMhD-0004GE-00; Wed, 07 May 2003 06:02:48 -0500 Received: by wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 94DD97423F; Wed, 7 May 2003 13:02:35 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 13:02:35 +0200 From: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gcc-default - build is incorrect with nmu versioning Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_04_23 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_04_23 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: gcc-defaults Version: 1.5 Severity: important built packages versions are incorrect if gcc-defaults is built with nmu versioning | $ echo "Version: 1.5" | awk -F. '/^Version:/ {print $NF}' | 5 | $ echo "Version: 1.5.1" | awk -F. '/^Version:/ {print $NF}' | 1 bastian -- What kind of love is that? Not to be loved; never to have shown love. -- Commissioner Nancy Hedford, "Metamorphosis", stardate 3219.8 --------------------------------------- Received: (at 192271-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2003 20:16:49 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 16 14:16:41 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ALTK4-0000cG-00; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 14:16:40 -0600 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA01430 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 21:15:46 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id hAGKFjmo026789; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 21:15:45 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 21:15:45 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: gcc-default - build is incorrect with nmu versioning X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_99 version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) won't fix this, there are plenty of gcc maintainers, who can do regular uploads.