Your message dated Fri, 15 Oct 2004 19:30:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line broken binutils dependencies in gcc-3.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Aug 2004 18:23:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 02 11:23:32 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from www.hostsharing.net (pima.hostsharing.net) [212.42.230.151]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BrhTA-0004G2-00; Mon, 02 Aug 2004 11:23:32 -0700
Received: from mail.home.lxtec.de (pD9ECEC9C.dip.t-dialin.net [217.236.236.156])
(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pima.hostsharing.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 310F5B0028C5; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 20:23:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by mail.home.lxtec.de with esmtp (Exim 4.41 1 (Debian))
id 1BrhT5-000114-5s; Mon, 02 Aug 2004 20:23:27 +0200
Received: from mail.home.lxtec.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (baumbart [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 03763-03; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 20:23:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from frodo.home.lxtec.de ([192.168.200.202])
by mail.home.lxtec.de with esmtp (Exim 4.41 1 (Debian))
id 1BrhT4-00010y-1M; Mon, 02 Aug 2004 20:23:26 +0200
Received: from riesebie by frodo.home.lxtec.de with local (Exim 4.41)
id 1BrhT3-0001y7-Mi; Mon, 02 Aug 2004 20:23:25 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gcc-3.4_3.4.1-5 doesn't work with binutils oldet tha 2.15
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 20:23:25 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at home.lxtec.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: gcc-3.4
Version: 3.4.1-5
Severity: minor
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-rc2-frodo
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Versions of packages gcc-3.4 depends on:
ii binutils 2.15-1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii cpp-3.4 3.4.1-5 The GNU C preprocessor
ii gcc-3.4-base 3.4.1-5 The GNU Compiler Collection (base
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:3.4.1-5 GCC support library
-- no debconf information
I tried to use the gcc-3.4_3.4.1-5 but ld was missing an option called
--as-needed. This was binutils 2.14.90.0.7-8. Updated to 2.15-1 and that grand
piece of open-source software seems to work ;-)
Should we make a depency to the binutils-version gcc is compiled with?
Ciao
Elimar
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 263019-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2004 02:30:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 15 19:30:27 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain)
[66.93.39.86]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CIeKx-0001eA-00; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 19:30:27 -0700
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id ACF8C171FF4; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 19:30:26 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 19:30:26 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: broken binutils dependencies in gcc-3.4
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
A version of gcc-3.4 that build-depends and depends on binutils 2.15 is
now in testing, and binutis 2.15 is also in testing, therefore I believe
these two bugs can be closed.
Thanks,
--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
--ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBcIe8KN6ufymYLloRAogOAJ9XvAAd9mlpqIyww8N55Yv2JgFtnwCfdk5T
IU/2/W2Za57acfzPZAenS3E=
=NhY5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q--
