Your message dated Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:08:58 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line utah-glx build failure unreproducible
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 May 2003 14:56:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 04 09:56:01 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtpzilla5.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.141]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19CKuG-0001hS-00; Sun, 04 May 2003 09:56:00 -0500
Received: from pomme (mvz.xs4all.nl [80.126.4.68])
by smtpzilla5.xs4all.nl (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h44EtwaL074339;
Sun, 4 May 2003 16:55:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from matijs by pomme with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19CKuw-00051H-00; Sun, 04 May 2003 16:56:42 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Matijs van Zuijlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: cpp-3.2: utah-glx_0.0-cvs-20010702-4.3(unstable/m68k) FTBFS:
"/lib/cpp" fails sanity check
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Sun, 04 May 2003 16:56:41 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Matijs van Zuijlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_04_23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_04_23
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: cpp-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.3-1
Severity: normal
Tags: sid
utah-glx fails to build from source on m68k. Something appears to be
wrong with cpp. The build log says:
Automatic build of utah-glx_0.0-cvs-20010702-4.3 on a4000t by sbuild/m68k
1.169
Build started at 20030429-0633
[...]
checking how to run the C preprocessor... /lib/cpp
configure: error: C preprocessor "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check
See `config.log' for more details.
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1
[...]
See
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=utah-glx&ver=0.0-cvs-20010702-4.3&arch=m68k&stamp=1051625043&file=log&as=raw
Previouse builds of this package were succesful on m68k.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 191865-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jan 2004 16:10:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 15 10:10:09 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AhA4O-0001xs-00; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:10:09 -0600
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA02986;
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:09:00 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id i0FG8wmM010694;
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:08:58 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:08:58 +0100
To: Matijs van Zuijlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: utah-glx build failure unreproducible
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14
X-Spam-Level:
Matijs van Zuijlen writes:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 09:43:08PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > tags 192865 + unreproducible
> > thanks
> >
> > unsure about the state of utah-glx. it's in stable only, so maybe we
> > should just close this report?
>
> Um, this bug belongs to htget. Which bug did you mean?
> utah-glx has been removed from testing and unstable, because the
> packaged version needs XFree86 3, which doesn't exist there. I have no
> plans to package the version for XFree86 4.
ok, I did mean 191865. And I'll close this report.
