------- Additional Comments From wilson at specifixinc dot com  2004-01-24 
03:31 -------
Subject: Re: PR 13722 candidate fix

On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 17:50, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> This, I think, can be addressed with peephole2 patterns, which have
> the ability to allocate scratch registers without risk of overlap.  A
> form like

I forgot that you had mentioned peephole2 earlier.  I am not very
familiar with this code.  I looked at the docs and looked at the code a
bit, and I see that this does look like it will work nicely.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13722

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


Reply via email to