------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-03-19 19:56 ------- I don't consider this as a bug. I'd just close it. Note that there is not much we can do about it: we can't say that there is an attempt to bind an rvalue to a non-const reference, because this would imply that we have already settled on one of the available overloads. However, how can we settle on one overload if we don't find a suitable one? The only thing we could do in addition to simply print the available overloads would be to say candidate 'xyz' is not available because it requires binding a temporary to a non-const reference but how should we ever be able to do that? This would amount to second guessing what the programmer wanted to do, and would likely yield quite a number of cases where the programmer did not intend this and is more confused by the message than not. W.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2112 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
